Search Engine www.edaboard.com

Blocking Non Blocking

Add Question

120 Threads found on edaboard.com: Blocking Non Blocking
Inter assignment delays can be used to model propagation delays. But an inter assignment delay of goes in the middle of of an non-blocking assignment. The OP has added a blocking delay to a procedural statement, which happens to be a non-blocking assignment. (...)
Given that this is a rotate right and a is probably supposed to be implemented as flip-flops, you shoul probably be using a non-blocking assignment (<=) instead of a blocking assignment (=).
If you check where output rcx_buffer is assigned in your code, you don't find any place. May be you confused rcx_buffer and rcx_buff? Generally, it's bad coding style to use blocking assigments in sequential always blocks. Suggest to rewrite the code with non-blocking assignments and then start to fix the (...)
I think inside the always@ clocked process statement you need to use the "<=" operator instead of "=" operator Yes, it's good practice to use non-blocking "<=" assignments in edge sensitive always blocks. But it's not strictly required. In the present example, it makes no difference at all, because the assigned value isn't read in a
Unfortunately you have cut part of the code, but it looks like the first code part is a combinational always block. If so, it's recommended to use blocking = assignments as well as non-blocking <= assignments for the registered (edge sensitive) always block, although the difference doesn't matter in the (...)
I've know fixed two problems: 1. count has to be at least 11 Bits wide to count to 1250 2. z has to be at least 4 Bits wide to count to 10 3. Removed non-blocking assignments (<=) The code know looks like this: module uart(input clk, output TXD); reg count; reg data; reg z; initial begin data = 10'b0010100101; /
Hi everybody, I have to use an RF IC switch in my circuit and it needs DC blocking capacitors for it work. In the datasheet it recommends 100pF for above 500MHz operation. I'm just wondering, can I just use any capacitor with a 100pF value (but one for high freq?) or does it have to be a special "DC blocking Capacitor"?
Dear friends, please help me to solve this problem, How to swap number in behavioral modeling(non blocking) Verilog Hdl, module swap(a,b); inout a,b; reg a,b; always@(a,b) begin b<=a; a<=b; end endmodule
non-blocking assignments get scheduled at the end of the block so the blocking assignments are scheduled in the order they appear and are then overwritten by the scheduled non-blocking assignment at the end of the always. Where in LRM it is stated (...)
You have to remember that loops are unrolled during compile time. So this means the loops will unroll into parrallel hardware, or serial hardware, depending on the behaviour of the code. You're safer here because you have non-blocking asignments, and so you get a pipeline. Using blocking assignments would (...)
We call any semiconductor an "active" device not just because it amplifies but because they are voltage or current control devices that may be linear or non-linear depending on bias , polarity and range. Diodes are also active and used primarily as switches in logic or clamps to suppress overvoltage or reverse blocking switches to prevent (...)
1. Read a Verilog book. 2. Read a Verilog book. 3. Read a Verilog book. 4. Remove the assigns they are for continuous assignments and they are NOT used in an always block. 5. change all your '=' (blocking assignments) in the edge sensitive always block (describing sequential registers) to '<=' (...)
You will avoid a lot of problems if you use blocking assignments "=" in combinatorial always blocks and non-blocking assignments "<=" in clocked always blocks until you understand when to break this rule.
You always need delays in an infinite loop having non blocking statements. Check below
You need to learn the difference between blocking (=) and non-blocking (<=) assignments. You should search either this forum or use google. in summary = for combinational logic, <= for sequential logic (i.e. flip-flops). Also you should use a synchronously deasserted reset, there is an
Hi. I am curious about what is difference begin~end && non blocking assignment and begin~end &&blocking assignment? Is this same? My simulation result is the same but I'm not sure.
Pipelining is usually done when the design is not able to meet the required operating frequency. Long combo paths are broken down into shorter paths by inserting registers in between. This reduces the combi delay and thus increases the operating frequency. Registers are usually implemented in RTL by non blocking statements. But all (...)
Show your code. - - - Updated - - - The first assignment to temp will be ignored according to non-blocking behaviour.
You are also mixing = (blocking) and <= (non-blocking) assignments. You should stick with only using blocking assignments in combinational always blocks (always @*) and non-blocking in sequential always blocks (always @ (...)
Hi All, I am very new to verilog and got confused between the Relational operator <= (which is less than equal to) and the non-blocking assignment operator <=.:bang: I want to know how does the verilog compiler know that the variables on the either side of this operator means assignment operation not comparison or the vice versa.