Search Engine

Positive s11

Add Question

23 Threads found on Positive s11
Hi, I have a similar antenna to the one in this hfss design and I know that there is one or more mistakes inside because it doesn't give me the right radiation and gain results . For exemple. I think that I should have a positive gain and more logical s11 results but now from this design, I have a gain of -16 dB. Maybe it's because of my radiati
The amplifiers can be expected to have |s11| < 1, respectively positive dB value of return loss, respectively negative dB value of reflection factor. Surely not negative return loss dB value.
Hi, can anybody tell me why s11 and s21 show similar variation for a waveguide below cut off frequency of the waveguide? I am getting required operation above the cut off frequency, but below the cut off frequency i am getting positive values for s11 and s21 as the frequency approaches the cut off. thanking in advance.
I used the Agilent 85033C Cal Kit. When I finished the Cal procedure, I re-checked the short, open and load terminations on the VNA's Smith Chart, and they were correct. So I am puzzled by the positive s11 response. Sure it matches because you used them for calibration, but I think it's not a broken standard, ot
It's possible that your circuit oscillates at around 75 GHz and in Transient simulation the circuit's performance is affected by this oscillation. Check your current and voltages and check for beginning s11 and s22 if their magnitudes become positive at around 75 GHz.
although S21 is the graph that will define bandwidth..... but if you want to extract Bandwidth info from s11 than for general understanding u can say ... "the band on which the magnitude or s11 is below -10db or more (-20db, -30db etc) is your bandwidth... as because where S21 has its positive peak on the same frequency the (...)
With "positive s11 parameters", you mean |s11| > 1, a vectorial s11 value outside the unity circle?
hi please , when i simulate patch antenna , i find s11 for desirable frequency (fr) <-10dB (good adaptation) , but i find phase diagram of s11 positive and always >0 deg! what that means please (physically) and is there an error ?
Hello, I'm measuring a transistor device with the goal of obtaining transit frequency from the H-21 curve. I have open and short de-embedding structures to deembed using two methods outlined in the paper below: AN IMPROVED DEEMBEDDING TECHNIQUE FOR ON-WAFER HIGH-FREQUENCY CHARACTERIZATION the first one is the simple Y_transistor = Y_dut -
Hi, I am doing a CMOS Active filter circuit using Cadence Virtuoso with 50 Ohms ports at the input and output. After the simulation the results of the filter S21 is good and as expected (high gain, high Q), but the input return loss s11 shows a positive value. I was expecting a negative s11 value... does this has something to do with (...)
I've heard that getting positive s11 parameters is a simulation issue. Can someone please help me know what settings to tweak in this file so i can get the correct s11 parameters? Please, If you can solve it, specify what you did. Thanks. By the way, in this simulation, I'm trying to use glass to "shield" the RFID UHF tag antenna from the (...)
How to measure input impedance having negative resistance using VNA?? My VNA(Agilent 8753ES) doesn't seems to plot the area of s11>1. Is VNA setting same as input impedance having positive resistance? Or there another VNA setting ?? I want to check impedance in the display right after probing the circuit. Please let me know. Thanks.
positive S21 means that there is extra power added in the free space , make sure that ur measurements frequency is away from the wireless standards like GSM and WiFi and all these signals. positive s11 also can results from these signals so check ur frequencies another this , check ur calibration procedures Khouly
so you used some horn antenna setup with perhaps 10 db of insertion loss, and told the network analyzer to use it as a 0 dB loss thru section. Then you put some sample in the way and found a slightly positive S21. And, your question is what?
Hi, i am new with this software. My problem is i have wrongs in my simulation with gain. s11 and S12 must not be more than zero. i simulate resonators. i have some positive values in my simulation. see picture below please check your # is passes before simulating. Maybe the convergence problem messes up the matrix
Hello, You said you designed means simulated or fabricated a prototype!!! The s11 can't be positive their may be some problem with the device model parameter or file... Yes, it is unstable (oscillations), plot the K or B1 stability factor plots or stability circle measurements on smith chart.... See more here
I'm trying to simulate microstrip array in IE3D using periodic boundary. The simulation for single element pass OK but when I insert the periodic boundary the simulation gives me negative values for the real part of the input impedance and positive values for s11 in . I should add that the array I'm simulating has thick substrate so ther
hi how can i design a microstrip board with a response like this: delta(s21)=12dB through 6~12GHz with a positive fix slope s11 and s22 less than -5dBm infact how can i implement a S parameter matrix(vs freq) in a microstrip board thanks for your help
Hi TWang I think the positive s11 results show that our simulation hasn't convergence and we should change our simulation parameters such mesh, simulation frequency, feed structure,... i hope it'll be helpful
Hi, I have modeled a partch antenna (including the feed structure). But the problem is when I plot the Return Loss (dB) over the frequency range there is a section where the return loss is > 0 db and reaches a peak of 6dB. Thats doesn't make sence to me. It's a passive structure. Just wanted to check if that make sence in any way. thank